BESS site screening
Initial assessment of land, grid environment, voltage level, constraints, co-location potential and project logic.
You receive: a prioritised traffic-light assessment with the most critical review points.
BESS · PV co-location · energy infrastructure
Before you invest in a BESS site, ENFAN assesses land and project ideas for battery storage, PV co-location and energy infrastructure independently – with no proprietary land interest, no EPC commission and no trading mandate. The result is a robust decision basis for grid access, permitting, stakeholder acceptance and site option value.
Why ENFAN
A battery storage project is not viable simply because land is available or inexpensive. What matters is whether bidirectional grid access, permitting path, technical configuration, local stakeholder acceptance and commercial rationale fit together. ENFAN assesses these factors at an early stage and with an open outcome: if a site does not appear viable, this is stated clearly before major costs for studies, grid applications, leases or project acquisitions arise.
Services
For project developers, investors, municipal utilities, municipalities, landowners, charging-hub operators and industrial or commercial sites.
Initial assessment of land, grid environment, voltage level, constraints, co-location potential and project logic.
You receive: a prioritised traffic-light assessment with the most critical review points.
Compact Phase-0 decision document covering site, grid logic, permitting risk, acceptance and next steps.
You receive: a reviewable go/no-go decision basis for owners, municipalities, investors or project partners.
Independent assessment of project pipelines: which sites are realistic, should be prioritised or should be filtered out early?
You receive: clear prioritisation instead of an unweighted list of sites.
Structured preparation of grid-operator requests, evaluation of connection options, import/export capability and connection economics.
You receive: open grid questions and connection variants as a decision basis.
Initial assessment of planning law, land context, environmental aspects, neighbourhood issues and municipal decision paths.
You receive: a realistic view of whether the site justifies the next planning step.
Assessment of storage potential at PV, wind, commercial, energy district and infrastructure sites with a focus on local benefit.
You receive: an assessment of whether co-location increases site value.
Site logic
It is the site with the highest option value: technically connectable, permitting-feasible, communicable to local authorities and open to multiple revenue models over time. Since many storage ideas compete for scarce grid and permitting capacity, early site logic separates realistic projects from costly detours.
Discuss a project ideaGrid access has the highest weighting because a storage site without robust import and export capability is rarely viable from a commercial or permitting perspective.
Sites
Target groups
ENFAN supports early decisions wherever land, grid access, permitting and commercial rationale need to be brought together.
Initial assessment of whether a plot may be relevant for battery storage, PV, co-location or energy infrastructure.
Assessment of how storage projects can be integrated into municipal decision processes in terms of planning, communication and local benefit.
Independent prioritisation of project ideas and pipelines regarding grid-access probability, permitting risk and implementation maturity.
Early-phase site check before significant costs arise for studies, grid-connection procedures or project acquisitions.
Structuring local flexibility, storage and co-location projects at the interface of grid, generation, load and municipality.
Assessment of whether storage at existing or planned generation sites can create value through co-location, curtailment reduction or market capability.
Check land
A plot only becomes viable when grid access, planning law, technical access, distances, site access and stakeholder acceptance fit together. Indicative size requirements depend strongly on the project: medium-voltage systems require significantly less land than large-scale storage near high-voltage infrastructure; the decisive factor remains the specific grid-access and permitting feasibility.
ENFAN Site File
The ENFAN Site File bundles the relevant review fields for an initial go/no-go decision and creates a solid basis for further discussions with the grid operator, municipality, owner, investor or project partner. It is designed as a compact decision document; scope and depth depend on data availability, site complexity and mandate.
Request a site fileCo-location potential
ENFAN assesses whether a storage site should be considered as a stand-alone project or whether a combination with generation, load, charging infrastructure or municipal infrastructure creates a more robust project profile.
PV-BESS
Co-location can help make local generation more usable and build site value across several revenue and use-case logics.
Load proximity
Where demand and grid constraints meet, storage can be more than a trading asset.
Strategy
A solid pre-check makes a project easier to connect to later EPC, trading, financing and operator partners.
FAQ
No. Distance alone is not decisive; the concrete bidirectional connection option, grid capacity, voltage level, protection concept and connection economics matter.
This depends strongly on power, storage duration, technology, required distances, access roads, transformers and expansion options. ENFAN therefore works with indicative ranges and assesses the specific site logic.
Early. Stakeholder acceptance, local-benefit arguments and a realistic permitting path should not be considered only after detailed technical planning.
Not necessarily. Feed-in and consumption must be assessed separately. For battery storage, the import and export capability of the connection is a central point.
Large engineering firms are strong in detailed planning, specialist studies and permitting documentation. ENFAN starts earlier: in the phase where the question is whether a site justifies that next planning stage at all.
Costs depend on data availability, review depth and site complexity. For clearly defined initial checks, ENFAN can prepare a fixed-price offer.
A structured initial assessment with review fields, open questions, project risks, prioritisation and a proposal for the next robust work step.
ENFAN positions itself as an independent early-phase, site and structuring partner. Trading, construction or operator partners can be involved later on a project-specific basis.
No. ENFAN does not provide fire-protection or safety specialist planning and does not replace required specialist studies. ENFAN identifies the relevant interfaces, review questions and next specialist steps at an early stage.
Process
Quickly assess land, grid environment, constraints, surrounding uses, data availability and project size.
Assess bidirectional connection, voltage level, connection costs, protection requirements and variants.
Bring together planning law, environmental aspects, communication, local value creation and required specialist reviews.
Site score, risk matrix, recommendation and next steps for grid operator, municipality and financing.
Spatial planning · Permitting strategy · Energy infrastructure · Stakeholder acceptance
Profile
Dr. Eva Frensemeier combines spatial planning, permitting strategy and renewable-energy project development. Her focus is the early question of which sites are truly viable for battery storage, PV co-location and decentralised energy infrastructure.
ENFAN applies this experience to a central bottleneck in the energy transition: bringing together land, grid access, municipal acceptance and economic benefit so that a site idea can become a realisable project.
For larger mandates, Dr. Eva Frensemeier works with a project-specific curated expert network. This keeps ENFAN personally led while enabling several site, permitting and due-diligence projects to be supported in parallel with solid expertise and without unnecessary overhead structures.
Curated expert network
ENFAN is deliberately designed as a lean, high-quality advisory structure. Dr. Eva Frensemeier remains the central contact and technical project lead. For specialist questions, a curated expert network is involved per mandate – exactly as large as the project requires.
This model combines personal responsibility with access to additional expertise in grid, technical interfaces, permitting strategy, market model, financing, communication and stakeholder acceptance.
Insights
BESS
A generation feed-in connection is not yet a robust storage connection. Import and export must be assessed as an independent site question.
Co-location
Storage creates the greatest value when it connects local generation, consumption and market options.
Stakeholder acceptance
Transparent involvement and local value creation often determine speed and feasibility.
Contact
Send whatever you have: address, plot number, aerial image, project idea or existing grid-connection information. A plot number is enough for an initial assessment. A follow-up call can be arranged if useful.